Extraneous-Functionality-KrishnaG-CEO

OWASP Top 10 for Mobile Apps: M10 – Extraneous Functionality

Extraneous functionality can be defined as any feature or functionality that is present in a mobile application but is either unintentional or no longer needed. It may be left over from earlier stages of the development process, such as during testing or debugging, or added for convenience but overlooked as the application moves closer to production. Regardless of the reason for its existence, extraneous functionality represents a security risk.

LDAP-Injection-KrishnaG-CEO

Comprehensive Guide to LDAP Injection: SANS Top 25 CWE-90

LDAP Injection attacks are a severe and growing threat, with the potential to compromise sensitive data, escalate privileges, and disrupt business operations. Real-world incidents have demonstrated the wide-ranging consequences of such vulnerabilities, including financial losses, reputational damage, and regulatory repercussions.

By understanding the risks associated with LDAP Injection and adopting best practices for mitigation, organisations can protect themselves from these types of attacks. Regular security assessments, input validation, and the use of secure coding practices are essential for preventing LDAP Injection vulnerabilities and safeguarding against the potentially devastating impacts of these attacks.

LDAP Injection is a critical vulnerability that can have devastating consequences for an organisation, ranging from unauthorised data access to privilege escalation. By understanding how LDAP Injection works, the risks it presents, and the steps that can be taken to identify and mitigate it, penetration testers can play a pivotal role in strengthening the security posture of an organisation.

PenTest-Anthropic-KrishnaG-CEO

Penetration Testing Anthropic: Securing the Future in an Era of Advanced Cybersecurity Threats

**Penetration Testing Anthropic** combines traditional penetration testing methods with a more nuanced understanding of human behaviour, cognitive psychology, and artificial intelligence (AI). The term “anthropic” refers to anything that relates to human beings or human perspectives, and in this context, it highlights the critical role human elements play in both security and attack strategies.

While traditional penetration testing often focuses on exploiting technical vulnerabilities in systems, Penetration Testing Anthropic goes beyond these boundaries by considering how human behaviours—both of attackers and defenders—can influence the outcome of a cyberattack. This includes social engineering tactics, cognitive biases, organisational culture, decision-making processes, and the integration of AI and machine learning into attack and defence mechanisms.

This approach represents a shift from purely technical penetration testing to a more comprehensive model that accounts for the psychological, social, and technological aspects of cybersecurity.

PenTesting-ELK-Stack-KrishnaG-CEO

Penetration Testing the ELK Stack: Ensuring Security in a Data-Driven World

For businesses leveraging the ELK Stack for log management, search, and analytics, penetration testing is an essential practice to ensure the security of sensitive data and maintain the integrity of operations. By understanding the security concerns, adopting proactive testing methodologies, and implementing appropriate remediation strategies, C-suite executives can safeguard their organisation’s data infrastructure from evolving cyber threats.

Penetration testing the ELK Stack should be seen as an ongoing process, integrated into regular security audits and monitoring practices. By doing so, businesses can confidently harness the power of the ELK Stack, knowing they are prepared to handle any security vulnerabilities that may arise.