cybersecurity

API-Security-Misconfigurations-KrishnaG-CEO

The OWASP Top 10 API Security Risks – 2023: API8:2023 – Security Misconfiguration

by

At its core, **security misconfiguration** occurs when the security settings of an API or its supporting systems are improperly configured or left at their default settings. APIs often rely on a wide range of underlying infrastructure, including web servers, databases, cloud services, and identity management systems. Each of these elements needs to be configured in line with security best practices to ensure the overall security posture of the API.

Misconfigurations can arise at any stage in the API lifecycle, from development to deployment, and they are not limited to a single type of vulnerability. They may involve poorly configured authentication mechanisms, incorrect access control settings, or vulnerabilities in third-party services integrated into the API ecosystem.

Unrestricted-Resource-KrishnaG-CEO

OWASP Top 10 API Security Risks – 2023: API4:2023 – Unrestricted Resource Consumption

by

Unrestricted resource consumption occurs when an API allows users or clients to request resources without proper limits or controls. Every API request consumes a certain amount of resources such as CPU cycles, memory, network bandwidth, storage, and other external services (e.g. email, SMS, or biometric validation). If these resources are not regulated, an attacker can exploit the API to consume disproportionate resources, leading to a range of undesirable consequences including:
Denial of Service (DoS): An attacker may cause the API to become unresponsive by overwhelming it with an excessive number of requests, or by requesting resources that are computationally expensive, leading to system crashes or slowdowns.
Inflated Operational Costs: APIs that involve third-party services, such as SMS or email delivery, may incur costs for each request. Without proper restrictions, malicious actors can generate high volumes of such requests, leading to unexpected cost overruns.
Data Loss or Degradation: APIs that allow unregulated access to large amounts of data or storage can be abused, resulting in slow system performance, data corruption, or loss.

Extraneous-Functionality-KrishnaG-CEO

OWASP Top 10 for Mobile Apps: M10 – Extraneous Functionality

by

Extraneous functionality can be defined as any feature or functionality that is present in a mobile application but is either unintentional or no longer needed. It may be left over from earlier stages of the development process, such as during testing or debugging, or added for convenience but overlooked as the application moves closer to production. Regardless of the reason for its existence, extraneous functionality represents a security risk.

LDAP-Injection-KrishnaG-CEO

Comprehensive Guide to LDAP Injection: SANS Top 25 CWE-90

by

LDAP Injection attacks are a severe and growing threat, with the potential to compromise sensitive data, escalate privileges, and disrupt business operations. Real-world incidents have demonstrated the wide-ranging consequences of such vulnerabilities, including financial losses, reputational damage, and regulatory repercussions.

By understanding the risks associated with LDAP Injection and adopting best practices for mitigation, organisations can protect themselves from these types of attacks. Regular security assessments, input validation, and the use of secure coding practices are essential for preventing LDAP Injection vulnerabilities and safeguarding against the potentially devastating impacts of these attacks.

LDAP Injection is a critical vulnerability that can have devastating consequences for an organisation, ranging from unauthorised data access to privilege escalation. By understanding how LDAP Injection works, the risks it presents, and the steps that can be taken to identify and mitigate it, penetration testers can play a pivotal role in strengthening the security posture of an organisation.