data privacy

Unsafe-Consumption-of-API-KrishnaG-CEO

OWASP Top 10 API Security Risks – 2023: API10:2023 – Unsafe Consumption of APIs

by

The term “unsafe consumption of APIs” refers to the practice where developers trust data received from third-party APIs more than they trust user input, leading to weaker security standards for the data coming from these integrated services. Typically, this occurs because third-party APIs are seen as more “trusted” than direct user input, so developers may not apply the same level of scrutiny or security measures when consuming data from these external sources.

Extraneous-Functionality-KrishnaG-CEO

OWASP Top 10 for Mobile Apps: M10 – Extraneous Functionality

by

Extraneous functionality can be defined as any feature or functionality that is present in a mobile application but is either unintentional or no longer needed. It may be left over from earlier stages of the development process, such as during testing or debugging, or added for convenience but overlooked as the application moves closer to production. Regardless of the reason for its existence, extraneous functionality represents a security risk.

PenTest-Anthropic-KrishnaG-CEO

Penetration Testing Anthropic: Securing the Future in an Era of Advanced Cybersecurity Threats

by

**Penetration Testing Anthropic** combines traditional penetration testing methods with a more nuanced understanding of human behaviour, cognitive psychology, and artificial intelligence (AI). The term “anthropic” refers to anything that relates to human beings or human perspectives, and in this context, it highlights the critical role human elements play in both security and attack strategies.

While traditional penetration testing often focuses on exploiting technical vulnerabilities in systems, Penetration Testing Anthropic goes beyond these boundaries by considering how human behaviours—both of attackers and defenders—can influence the outcome of a cyberattack. This includes social engineering tactics, cognitive biases, organisational culture, decision-making processes, and the integration of AI and machine learning into attack and defence mechanisms.

This approach represents a shift from purely technical penetration testing to a more comprehensive model that accounts for the psychological, social, and technological aspects of cybersecurity.

Neuro-Plasticity-KrishnaG-CEO

Cyber Security Neuro Plasticity: A New Frontier for Penetration Testers and Information Security Researchers

by

Neuro plasticity, a cornerstone of neuroscience, refers to the brain’s capacity to reorganize itself in response to experiences. This phenomenon occurs at various levels, from the formation of new synapses to the creation of entirely new neural pathways. Factors such as learning, memory, and environmental stimuli can all influence neuro plasticity.

Cyber threats can exploit human vulnerabilities in ways that directly affect the brain. Phishing attacks, for example, leverage social engineering techniques to manipulate emotions and cognitive processes, leading to impulsive decision-making and compromised security. Malware can also impact cognitive function by causing stress, anxiety, and fatigue, which can impair judgment and attention.

EavesDropping-KrishnaG-CEO

Eavesdropping: A Silent Threat to MSME Business Owners

by

Eavesdropping, or passive surveillance, is a clandestine method that involves intercepting and monitoring communications without the knowledge or consent of those involved. This silent threat can pose significant risks to businesses, particularly those with confidential data and mission-critical operations.