Secure Coding Practices

Extraneous-Functionality-KrishnaG-CEO

OWASP Top 10 for Mobile Apps: M10 – Extraneous Functionality

by

Extraneous functionality can be defined as any feature or functionality that is present in a mobile application but is either unintentional or no longer needed. It may be left over from earlier stages of the development process, such as during testing or debugging, or added for convenience but overlooked as the application moves closer to production. Regardless of the reason for its existence, extraneous functionality represents a security risk.

Client-Code-Quality-KrishnaG-CEO

OWASP Top 10 for Mobile Apps: M7 – Client Code Quality

by

Client code quality refers to the soundness, reliability, and maintainability of the code executed on mobile devices. The “M7” designation in the OWASP Top 10 highlights vulnerabilities resulting from poorly written client-side code. These vulnerabilities can stem from inadequate input validation, insecure coding practices, or the use of deprecated libraries.

Insecure -Data-Storage-KrishnaG-CEO

M2: Insecure Data Storage – A Penetration Tester’s Guide

by

Insecure data storage refers to the practice of storing data in a manner that makes it vulnerable to unauthorised access, tampering, or theft. This can occur in various forms, such as improperly encrypted files, exposed databases, or unprotected cloud storage solutions. The consequences of insecure data storage can be far-reaching, ranging from financial losses to reputational damage and legal ramifications.

Penetration testers need to thoroughly evaluate an organisation’s data storage mechanisms to identify weaknesses and implement corrective measures before malicious actors can exploit them. This is particularly important as organisations increasingly store data in cloud environments, mobile applications, and third-party servers, each introducing unique security challenges.

Improper Platform-Usage-KrishnaG-CEO

In-Depth Analysis of OWASP Top 10 for Mobile Apps: M1 – Improper Platform Usage

by

Improper platform usage refers to the failure to properly use security features provided by mobile platforms, such as Android and iOS. Both operating systems offer robust security mechanisms that, when properly utilised, help safeguard mobile apps from common attack vectors. However, improper configuration or ignoring these features can lead to critical vulnerabilities, which can be easily exploited by attackers.

When testing mobile apps, penetration testers must focus on how these platform-specific features are being leveraged. Whether it’s improper handling of APIs, weak authentication methods, or ineffective data storage solutions, improper platform usage can leave significant security gaps in an otherwise well-constructed app.

HTTP-Response-Split-KrishnaG-CEO

CWE-113: HTTP Response Splitting – A Comprehensive Guide for Penetration Testers

by

HTTP Response Splitting is a web application vulnerability that occurs when an attacker is able to manipulate HTTP headers to split the response sent to the client. This manipulation exploits the way headers are processed by web servers and browsers, allowing attackers to inject malicious content into the response stream. The result can be a range of attacks, from cross-site scripting (XSS) to cache poisoning and web cache poisoning, all of which can disrupt business operations, damage brand reputation, and compromise sensitive data.