security testing

PenTest-Anthropic-KrishnaG-CEO

Penetration Testing Anthropic: Securing the Future in an Era of Advanced Cybersecurity Threats

by

**Penetration Testing Anthropic** combines traditional penetration testing methods with a more nuanced understanding of human behaviour, cognitive psychology, and artificial intelligence (AI). The term “anthropic” refers to anything that relates to human beings or human perspectives, and in this context, it highlights the critical role human elements play in both security and attack strategies.

While traditional penetration testing often focuses on exploiting technical vulnerabilities in systems, Penetration Testing Anthropic goes beyond these boundaries by considering how human behaviours—both of attackers and defenders—can influence the outcome of a cyberattack. This includes social engineering tactics, cognitive biases, organisational culture, decision-making processes, and the integration of AI and machine learning into attack and defence mechanisms.

This approach represents a shift from purely technical penetration testing to a more comprehensive model that accounts for the psychological, social, and technological aspects of cybersecurity.

Insecure-Design-KrishnaG-CEO

Insecure Design: A Critical Overview for Software Developers

by

Insecure design refers to flaws or omissions at the design stage of application development that lead to vulnerabilities in the system. Unlike implementation bugs, which result from coding errors, insecure design represents a fundamental failure to consider and incorporate security principles during planning and architecture.

Business-Logic-Attacks-KrishnaG-CEO

Business Logic Attacks: A Hidden Threat to C-Suite Leaders

by

At their core, business logic attacks exploit **gaps or errors in the workflows or rules governing an organisation’s operations**. These flaws are not due to programming errors but rather the **misuse of legitimate system features** or **misconfigured processes**. Attackers manipulate these weaknesses to achieve their objectives, such as:

– Circumventing security measures
– Accessing unauthorised data
– Fraudulently acquiring goods or services

OffSec-Board-KrishnaG-CEO

Board of Directors and Offensive Security: Navigating Cybersecurity Challenges at the Governance Level

by

The Board of Directors is responsible for overseeing the implementation of offensive security strategies and ensuring that they are effectively managed. This requires a proactive approach to risk management, where the Board plays an active role in setting the tone for cybersecurity governance and ensuring that appropriate resources and expertise are allocated to address identified risks.

Offensive security refers to the proactive approach of identifying vulnerabilities and potential threats within an organisation’s systems and networks. It involves techniques such as vulnerability assessments, penetration testing, malware analysis, cyber forensics, and reverse engineering. The goal is to simulate real-world attacks, uncover weaknesses, and develop strategies to counteract these threats before they are exploited by malicious actors.

OffSec-KrishnaG-CEO

Offensive Security: Strengthening Cyber Defences Through Active Threat Simulation

by

Offensive security encompasses a range of practices that simulate cyberattacks in a controlled environment, allowing businesses to identify security risks in their systems and address them before attackers can exploit them. The core components of offensive security include vulnerability assessment, penetration testing, malware analysis, cyber forensics, and reverse engineering.