SSRF vulnerabilities occur when an API fetches a remote resource using a user-supplied Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) without adequate validation. This oversight allows attackers to manipulate the request, coercing the server to interact with unintended destinations. These attacks bypass traditional network controls like firewalls and VPNs, making them particularly insidious.
Broken Function Level Authorisation occurs when an attacker is able to access functions or data that they are not authorised to use. This happens due to inadequate enforcement of role-based access controls (RBAC) or a failure to properly segregate administrative and regular user functions. APIs often expose a variety of functions depending on the user’s role (e.g., regular user, administrator, manager, etc.). When these functions are not sufficiently protected or are poorly designed, attackers can bypass these restrictions to gain unauthorised access to sensitive information or perform malicious activities.
API3:2023 represents a nuanced security challenge where improper or absent authorisation checks allow attackers to access or manipulate sensitive properties of an object within an API. Unlike broader access control issues, this risk focuses specifically on granular authorisation, which determines the visibility or modifiability of individual object properties.
Extraneous functionality can be defined as any feature or functionality that is present in a mobile application but is either unintentional or no longer needed. It may be left over from earlier stages of the development process, such as during testing or debugging, or added for convenience but overlooked as the application moves closer to production. Regardless of the reason for its existence, extraneous functionality represents a security risk.
LDAP Injection attacks are a severe and growing threat, with the potential to compromise sensitive data, escalate privileges, and disrupt business operations. Real-world incidents have demonstrated the wide-ranging consequences of such vulnerabilities, including financial losses, reputational damage, and regulatory repercussions.
By understanding the risks associated with LDAP Injection and adopting best practices for mitigation, organisations can protect themselves from these types of attacks. Regular security assessments, input validation, and the use of secure coding practices are essential for preventing LDAP Injection vulnerabilities and safeguarding against the potentially devastating impacts of these attacks.
LDAP Injection is a critical vulnerability that can have devastating consequences for an organisation, ranging from unauthorised data access to privilege escalation. By understanding how LDAP Injection works, the risks it presents, and the steps that can be taken to identify and mitigate it, penetration testers can play a pivotal role in strengthening the security posture of an organisation.