x-AI-VAPT-KrishnaG-CEO

Explainable AI in VAPT: Unpacking Business Logic for Penetration Testers

In the ever-evolving cybersecurity landscape, penetration testing (pentesting) has transitioned from being a compliance checkbox to a strategic imperative. With Explainable AI (XAI) entering the cybersecurity fold, particularly within Vulnerability Assessment and Penetration Testing (VAPT), there’s a transformative opportunity for businesses to align security outcomes with strategic insights. But the real question is — can Explainable AI truly assist penetration testers in understanding business logic vulnerabilities?

Explainable AI in Information Security

In the escalating arms race between cyber defenders and attackers, artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a force multiplier—enabling real-time detection, adaptive response, and predictive threat intelligence. However, as these AI systems become increasingly complex, their decision-making processes often resemble a black box: powerful but opaque.
In sectors like healthcare or finance, the risks of opaque AI are already well-documented. But in cybersecurity—where decisions are made in seconds and the stakes are existential—lack of explainability is not just a technical inconvenience; it’s a business liability.
Security teams are already burdened by alert fatigue, tool sprawl, and talent shortages. Introducing opaque AI models into this environment, without explainable reasoning, exacerbates operational risks and undermines confidence in automated systems.
In a field that demands accountability, Explainable AI (XAI) isn’t a luxury—it’s a necessity.
From Security Operations Centre (SOC) analysts to CISOs and regulatory auditors, all stakeholders need clarity on what triggered a threat alert, why an incident was escalated, or how a threat actor was profiled. Without this transparency, false positives go unchallenged, real threats slip through, and strategic trust in AI-based defences begins to erode.
In this blog, we’ll explore how Explainable AI—XAI—helps transform cyber defence from a black-box model to a glass-box ecosystem, where decisions are not only accurate but also interpretable, auditable, and accountable.

xAI-Cyber-Security-KrishnaG-CEO

🔍 Explainable AI in Cybersecurity: Making Defence Decisions Transparent and Trustworthy

Cybersecurity AI systems ingest terabytes of structured and unstructured data—logs, network traffic, endpoint signals, emails—to detect threats and anomalies. These systems often use complex models like Random Forests, Deep Neural Networks, or Unsupervised Clustering techniques.

AI-CISO-Future-KrishnaG-CEO

AI in Defence and Offensive Operations: Strategic Opportunities and Emerging Threats for the C-Suite

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming the battlefield—both physical and digital. For the C-Suite, especially CISOs, CTOs, and CEOs, understanding the dual-edged nature of AI in defence and offensive operations is no longer optional; it’s strategic. While AI enhances security operations through real-time detection, threat intelligence, and automated responses, it simultaneously empowers adversaries to be agile, personalise, and automate cyberattacks.
This blog provides an in-depth analysis of AI’s role across defensive and offensive cyber threats, pragmatic use cases, real-world threat scenarios, and actionable insights to support strategic decision-making.

Weak-Model-Provenance-KrishnaG-CEO

Weak Model Provenance: Trust Without Proof

Weak Model Provenance: Trust Without Proof A critical weakness in today’s AI model landscape is the lack of strong provenance mechanisms. While tools like Model Cards and accompanying documentation attempt to offer insight into a model’s architecture, training data, and intended use cases, they fall short of providing cryptographic or verifiable proof of the model’s …

Continue